Archive for the 'Watching' Category

Finding Neverland

Wednesday, September 21st, 2005

#46 in my movie challenge for the year, Finding Neverland was good, but not great. Johnny Depp did a wonderful job, and the movie had some lovely effects for the interplay between reality and imaginination. It did a valiant job avoiding sentimentality. Even so, there were times that it dipped, perhaps unavoidably given the subject matter, into preciousness. One other thing that nagged was that it has not been that long since I’ve read Peter Pan; the presentation of how Barrie viewed children in the movie does not mesh with my memory of the book. I recall that the book portrays children as selfish and rather cruel. It doesn’t paint Peter Pan in a romantic or likeable way. I will have to re-read my copy (which has lovely illustrations by the late Trina Schart Hyman, one of my favorite illustrators) to see if the disjunction lies in my memory or in the film.

Where Does One Find the Time?

Tuesday, September 20th, 2005

I recently saw a friend who complained I was posting too many reviews; she wanted to know more about what was going on in my life. I know the posts can get review-heavy, but I spend a lot of my time on books and movies, so the reviews are a reflection of what is going on in my life, at least in part.

I have also been asked more than once how I find the time to read, to write, and to watch movies in addition to caring for a toddler. The answer is simple, though it’s not easy. I set myself book and movie challenges because I did not feel I was reading or seeing movies enough. The reason I have a weblog is so I keep up a regular writing practice. I’ve moved these things to the top of my priority list, which means other things get moved down, or even bumped off.

I have time because I make time. I make time for these things by not doing other things. My father has a few favorite phrases, one of which is “everything is a compromise.” The older I get the more I see how true it is. I can write, or read, or watch a movie, but it means I don’t clean the bathroom, do laundry, obsessively check my email, surf the ‘net, or dabble in other hobbies. I used to play the flute and do counted cross-stitch projects. I got rid of these things because I wanted to focus on the things I already love, which include books, music, cooking, movies, television, and comics.

I’m able to finish books because I take time to read. I’m not a fast reader, but I am a consistent one. I read a little bit when Drake goes down for his nap, then again before I go to sleep at night. I take my book with me wherever I go, so if I have a spare moment I can get a little reading done. There are so many things that can distract me, but by eschewing some things and focusing on others, I have a life that better reflects what is truly important to me.

Heads Up: Fall TV 2005 premiers

Monday, September 19th, 2005

The new season starts in earnest this week, with lots of premieres, both season and series. After careful consideration of my Entertainment Weekly, here is what is going to be on our Tivo this season:

Sunday: nothing

Monday: premiers tonight! 9/19: Arrested Development, followed by Kitchen Confidential, Fox, 8 to 9, EST. Not sure about KC, which is adapted from Anthony Boudain’s memoir of the same name, but will give it a try, since it’s just 30 minutes.

Tuesday: premiers tomorrow, 9/20: My Name is Earl (redneck karmic comedy), starring Jason Lee. NBC, 9 to 9:30 EST. Already premiered: Bones (David Boreanaz, channeling deadpan Duchovny, plays another former killer who wants to atone for his past, aided by far-too-fashionably-dressed-to-be-as-out-of-touch-as-she-says anthropologist Emily Deschanel), followed by House, Fox 8 to 10 EST.

Wednesday: premiers day after tomorrow, 9/21: Lost, followed by Invasion (produced by Shaun Cassidy! Starring William Fichtner! Not necessarily about aliens!), ABC, 9 to 11 EST. Also, premiering next week is my last year’s fave, girl detective Veronica Mars, UPN 9 to 10 EST.

Thursday: nothing

Friday: as if sci-fi Friday needed another entry. We’ve got Firefly and Battlestar Galactica on the Sci-Fi channel, and are adding Threshold (aliens and Carla Gugino!), which debuted last week, CBS, 9 to 10 EST.

So if we add in our weekly half hour of Ebert and Roeper, then it’s ten hours of TV a week, averaging more than an hour a night. I’m guessing this will be whittled down as we actually watch these shows and see how they are. Rescue Me has just finished, coincidentally just when G. Grod and I decided we were finished with it. And I just cannot bring myself to care about the O.C. any longer.

A few questions. Where did I pick up the crush on Fichtner? I think it was already there when Blackhawk Down came out, and the IMDB is no help. Also, why was it Matthew Fox in wet clothes on the cover of EW, and not Sayeed? WHY???

Fall 2005 TV

Friday, September 16th, 2005

I did finally get a copy of Entertainment Weekly’s Fall TV issue, thanks to the Har Mar Barnes & Noble, and no thanks to my local Target, which I’d been haunting just about daily for over a week.

I’m beginning to suspect a depressing truth, and that is that no show is as good after the first season. Prove me wrong, discuss, but I can’t think of an example. So it is with some trepidation that I look forward to the premier of last year’s favorite Veronica Mars on Wednesday September 28th. (My bet for who was at the door? Wallace. Though I really wish it were Logan.)

EW hyped Prison Break, which started a couple weeks ago. I fretted that I’d missed it, but the folks at TeeVee say that it’s “Fox dumb.” So I think I’m OK with giving it a miss.

I watched the premier of Bones along with the season premier of House on Tuesday, and both were good, not great. I agree with TeeVee’s assessment of Bones:

But underneath the surface, there’s at least the skeleton of a good TV show here. If Bones, inspired by the books of forensic anthropologist Kathy Reichs, doesn’t get everything right – and it definitely doesn’t – at least it absolutely nails the things it needs to get right.

Tonight is the premier of Threshold, one of several Lost-ish supernatural shows. According to EW it’s one of the best, and it also stars Carla Gugino, one of G. Grod’s crushes, so we’ll be adding it to our sci-fi Friday lineup, which now has to be lowercase, since Threshold is on CBS. So the order of operations is: Firefly, Threshold, and Battlestar Galactica. Three hours of TV in one night? Thank goodness for Tivo.

March of the Penguins

Monday, September 12th, 2005

#45 in my movie challenge for the year was a big disappointment. It is a rare occasion that I get out to see a movie in the theater. The movie I really wanted to see, Hustle and Flow, was showing in just a few theaters and at inconvenient times. March of the Penguins, though, was showing at the close theater with good popcorn at a convenient time, so even though it wasn’t high on my list, I decided to give it a shot. While beautifully filmed under difficult conditions, the story, which is meant to be shocking, actually rather bored me. Yes, the penguins were awfully cute, but more than once it glossed over penguin death. Once they said that penguins who lag behind just “fade away” and later they say that a penguin father who does not survive the storm will just “disappear.” Buried under snow? Eaten by other penguins? Picked off by predators? The movie doesn’t say. There are times that the movie does show some of the more difficult moments, as when a mother penguin gets eaten by a seal, a penguin couple loses their egg, and baby pengins get attacked by a gull. But the movie can’t seem to decide how real it should get. Even these potentially disturbing scenes were primly edited. Ultimately, I wanted to know about the exceptions: what happens to the penguins who don’t conceive, whose mother’s don’t come back, the mothers who come back to find a dead father or baby, how many survive, how many die? March of the Penguins was lovely to look at and did have an interesting story. But the story, no matter how skillfully narrated by Morgan Freeman, did not delve in complexity or sophistication beyond the level of basic television. There were two other true animal movies out this summer, and I think my time and money would have been better spent on either The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill or Grizzly Man.

Vanity Fair

Friday, September 9th, 2005

#44 in my movie challenge for the year is Mira Nair’s Vanity Fair. This is a visually stunning interpretation of the classic book. Reese Witherspoon proves yet again that she’s not just a pretty face and has some serious talent. This bittersweet tale of poor, unconnected Becky Sharp, who gets by on her wits and talent, was both engaging and beautiful to look at.

To Have and Have Not

Friday, September 9th, 2005

#43 in my movie challenge for the year, To Have and Have Not is the second Bogey and Bacall movie of recent weeks, this is a lesser known charmer, and the first movie in which they worked together, and the one on which they fell in love. She is lovely to look at, entrancing to listen to, and the story is pretty good, too. Bogey is an outsider in France who is talked into helping someone from the resistance–sound familiar? This one has some great lines: “Just put your lips together and blow,” and “Have you ever been bit by a dead bee?” Perhaps it helps to have someone like William Faulkner working on the screenplay of a Hemingway novel. This movie is a great example of why it pays to keep an eye on what they’re showing on Turner Classic Movies.

What’s Going On

Friday, September 9th, 2005

I am currently obsessing about the Entertainment Weekly TV preview issue and why the heck I haven’t been able to get a copy yet. I’ve considered getting a subscription so I can stop this annual haunting of the newstands, but the Minneapolis post office can be slow, and it IS only this one issue that I crave.

I am currently paranoid about listeria. It is the one food poisoning that can cross the placenta, and in the past few weeks I’ve been laughing in the face of danger, consuming lunch meat, blue cheese, unpasteurized honey. I figured, hey, it’s rare and I’ll know if I get it within 48 hours. Apparently it can take WEEKS to manifest, and while rare it is usually deadly to the fetus. So I’m regretting my blithe, “this is my second pregnancy; no need to be paranoid like the first” attitude, and will be paranoid for the next month, at least.

I am currently fretting about pants. My regular pants and skirts don’t fit in the waist. Maternity wear looks as if I’m playing dress up. I’m in that awkward stage, which I hope I grow out of soon.

I am currently looking forward to watching TV tonight. My husband G. Grod and I call it “Sci-Fi Friday.” After Drake goes to bed we watch the Tivo’d Firefly then Battlestar Galactica, which has gotten crazy good.

I am currently between books, having just finished two whoppingly good ones, Francine Prose’s A Changed Man and Muriel Sparks’s The Driver’s Seat. Haven’t committed to the next book yet. Candidates include Other Electricities by Ander Monson, Tricked graphic novel by Alex Robinson, and The Skin Chairs by Barbara Comyns.

I am currently feeling a bit better from the cold, and a strange but not uncommon-for-me home-economy resolve has surfaced, which is to clear out the fridge, the freezer and the pantry of the stuff that’s been sitting around for weeks or longer and use it up. I have a LOT of rhubarb, though. And I don’t even like rhubarb.

The Thin Man

Wednesday, August 24th, 2005

#42 in my movie challenge for the year is this classic mystery adapted from the Dashiell Hammett novel, featuring Nick and Nora Charles and their dog Asta. The mystery of an inventor’s disappearance is less interesting than the intrigue among the suspects, which is secondary to the witty repartee between Nick and Nora, who steal the show. Particularly funny was a throwaway scene, the morning after a big party, where Nick leisurely pops balloons on the Christmas tree with a pop-gun. It’s rather shocking to see how casually excess drinking was taken, and how it is both a joke and sometimes a sign of upper-class urbanity. I wouldn’t be surprised if Nick and Nora needed some time in rehab following their adventures.

Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2005

#41 in my movie challenge for the year, and quite a departure from the previous film, Key Largo. Harold and Kumar is silly, fun, and knows its limits at under 90 minutes. It has been many years since I’ve had occasion to crave White Castle burgers, but I do remember how urgent those cravings always were. When I was in college, we had a local chain called Little Tavern, and a bag of Little T burgers never seemed as good an idea the morning after as it had the night before.

Both the leads are charming and one of the things that stands out about this comedy is that, without exception, all of the heroes are minorities, while all of the weirdo bad guys are not. It’s a refreshing turn, and one that I’m pleased did well at the box office. Plus, I’m sure this will go on to be a campus classic.

Key Largo

Thursday, August 11th, 2005

#40 in my movie challenge for the year is a Bogey/Bacall classic. Key Largo (1948) was directed by John Huston. Bogey plays the former military commander of Bacall’s late husband. He visits her and her father in law at the latter’s Key Largo hotel, only to find the place has been taken over by gangsters. Bacall is amazing–lovely to look at, entertaining to watch, and oh, what a joy to listen to that voice! She has a presence like few others. This is a dark thriller with a kind heart, much less naughty than The Big Sleep.

Cooking Shows and Cooking Mags

Wednesday, August 10th, 2005

I learned to cook when I found myself living alone for the first time in a tiny sublet that had a food processor. My mom sent me a copy of The Moosewood Cookbook, not because I was vegetarian but because it was easier to learn to cook on vegetables. I was so ignorant that I had to ask a foodie friend whether a clove of garlic was one segment or the whole head. (She never forgot that. Never mind that I’d been pretty sure of the answer, and was just checking to be certain. Years later she still laughed.)

It was a few years later that another foodie got me a subscription to Cook’s Illustrated. I’d read other cooking magagazines before–Food and Wine, Gourmet, and Bon Appetit. I liked them fine, though I found them largely the same. Cook’s Illustrated, though, was something else. It had no ads, just a few recipes per issue, plus a tasting and an equipment testing. Best of all, they were obsessed with food, so that when they published a recipe, they let you know just how many times and what variations were tried before arriving at the final recipe. It was like the Consumer Reports of cooking. I have been a subscriber now for about ten years.

A few years ago they began a show on PBS, America’s Test Kitchen. I was surprised to find that the show was a good complement to the magazine. It highlighted just a few recipes, plus one tasting and one testing. It featured staff from the magazine, and they were fun to watch. The style of the show was like the magazine–straightforward, not fancy, and above all, informational.

Last summer I spent a lot of time away when we sold our condo and bought a house. I decided to sign up for Cook’s Online, which includes all the recipes, as well as searchable databases. It has been a useful subscription even when I’m home and have access to all my back issues of Cook’s.

Finally, last year Cook’s sent out a solicitation for their new sister magazine, Cook’s Country, which a friend has jokingly called “Red-State Cook’s”. I was going to pass, since I felt one subscription plus online was enough, but was swayed by the “try it for free” offer. When it arrived, I prepared to write cancel on the invoice. That is, until my husband waved the magazine in my face and said excitedly, “Have you seen this? There are about seven recipes I want to make in here!” And so we became subscribers to Cook’s Country, as well.

We were converts to the Cook’s empire, then, but I’d managed to shed other cooking magazines and shows. Then a friend recommended Everyday Food, a digest-sized mag from the Martha Stewart empire. I checked it out, and found it had good photography and simple recipes that were true to the title. I also found they had a cooking show. The show, though, like the magazine, features a lot of recipes. It goes through them very quickly. There are some tidbits of information, but they are mostly very basic cooking tips, like generously salt water for pasta, and save some pasta water to thin the sauce if necessary. It isn’t a bad show, but I found it redundant to the magazine for me. Perhaps it would be more useful to someone newer to the cooking learning curve, however. I am going to give the magazine a try, though I’ve had a hard time tracking it down in stores. It features simple, straightforward recipes that would be ideal for weeknight cooking. I think it could be a good balance for Cook’s, which favors quality above all, sometimes resulting in longer cooking times.

Collateral

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2005

#39 in my movie challenge for the year was Collateral, directed by Michael Mann. While Tom Cruise may be an insensitive buffoon, he can sometimes act well, and here he does. Jamie Foxx is the everyday guy whose life quickly spirals out of control due to a bizarre chain of circumstances. He absolutely deserved his Oscar nomination. Collateral is beautiful to look at, well acted, fast paced and mesmerizing. I was so impressed with this film that I watched all the extras; I rarely watch even one. They made me appreciate the film, its direction and the acting all the more.

Bruce Campbell two-fer

Monday, August 1st, 2005

Last week I read Bruce Campbell’s autobiography If Chins Could Kill: Confessions of a B-Movie Actor (#56 in my book challenge for the year) and went to see Bruce host a screening of The Man with the Screaming Brain (#38 in my movie challenge for the year).

Bruce Campbell is best known for his starring work in the Evil Dead trilogy, a set of B-movie horror flicks from the 80’s and 90’s. I saw Evil Dead for the first time when I was in college (in Henle 21, for the record), because some guy friends were big fans. It was bloody and it was funny, and I remember one of the guys kept up a continuous chorus of, “Oh, this part is so awesome.” It was clear that the guys had the movie memorized.

The director of the Evil Dead films, Sam Raimi, hit the big time finally with the very good Spider Man and even better Spider Man 2. Campbell has managed to stay alive in Hollywood as a B actor, but he doesn’t bemoan his fate. He has genuine affection for the early movies and how much creative control he and his friends had on them. He’s been in some big movies, such as the Coen Brothers The Hudsucker Proxy, and has spent a lot of time doing series television, first on the short-lived Adventures of Brisco Country, Jr. and later as a recurring character first on Hercules: The Legendary Journeys and later on Xena: Warrior Princess. If Chins Could Kill is an entertaining, anecdote-laden trip. Campbell is humorous and self-effacing, and comes off as a likable guy. Bruce is touring in support of his new book, How to Make Love the Bruce Campbell Way.

The Man with the Screaming Brain is his first time directing a film. It was financed by the Sci-Fi channel, who told him he had to film in Bulgaria, so he re-wrote the movie around that. During the Q & A after the showing, Campbell joked that the film wasn’t released, it had escaped. He did a good bit of bantering back and forth, solidifying that funny, good-guy persona. The Man with the Screaming Brain is the story of a mad scientist (Stacey Keach) who discovers a way to merge brain cells of different people. It’s played for slapstick, and it is quite funny at times. Both City Pages and The Beat have reviewed it favorably, and perhaps a bit kindly, but it’s hard not to want to be kind to Campbell. It will air on the Sci Fi Channel on Septemer 10.

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

Friday, July 29th, 2005

#37 in my movie challenge for the year was Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. I both admired and enjoyed this film. Jim Carrey’s performance was remarkably restrained, and was perhaps the best I’ve seen from him. Winslet was just as strong, and never once did I question her American accent. A friend of mine derided Kirsten Dunst’s performance, but I think she did a fine job of playing an annoying, immature person who hasn’t learned from her mistakes. Screenwriter Charlie Kaufman also wrote Being John Malkovich and Adaptation. Both of those were technically good, though I didn’t much like them. They were about being up in one’s head, and detached from emotion. This film did an admirable job of being intellectual as well as emotional.

Owen Wilson/Ben Stiller double feature

Wednesday, July 27th, 2005

Movies 35 and 36 in my movie challenge for the year were Zoolander and Starsky & Hutch. These were good, funny little movies that got the laughs and then got out. Each clocked in at about 90 minutes, as a good comedy should–see Wilson’s Shanghai Noon and Shanghai Knights for why not to push it to two hours. I am not a Ben Stiller fan. I find him rather creepy. Yet I didn’t find his presence detrimental to these movies, and he was particularly funny as Starsky. Both movies had strong supporting roles by the hilarious Will Ferrell. The soundtrack to Starsky and Hutch was great, as were the fashions. I keep hoping that both Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson will find better movies and larger audiences, but they’re doing pretty well in Wedding Crashers, which is a good sign.

Running to Stand Still, with Cylons

Wednesday, July 27th, 2005

I can’t be the only one who has noticed that nothing has happened in the first two episodes of season two of Battlestar Galactica. Oh sure, there’s been some shooting, and a lot of people we’d never met and didn’t care about died, but at the end of the second episode we’re in a place no different than we were at the end of Season One: Adama’s unconscious, Apollo’s in trouble, Starbuck’s on Caprica, and that landing team on Kobol is screwed. Something better change Friday. I know it’s normal for a show to slump in its second season, but I can’t stop hoping. And I’m warning all and sundry, if the sophomore slump happens to Veronica Mars this fall, my wrath will know no bounds.

Also, if you didn’t notice but do care, Sci Fi is re-running Joss Whedon’s Firefly series in order in preparation for the release of the movie Serenity. Firefly is decent, and has a few cool bits, like how the ships don’t make sound in space, because, of course, they wouldn’t.

Howl’s Moving Castle

Tuesday, July 26th, 2005

Howl's Moving Castle #34 in my movie challenge for the year, Howl’s Moving Castle was both lovely and disappointing. Disappointing because the story got muddled in the middle and was hard to follow. I found this probably the least well done of director Hayao Miyazaki’s films. Then again, a lesser Miyazaki film is still well above average. There was a lot to like about the film. The visuals were lovely. I enjoyed the varying portrayals of the main character Sophie, both as a girl and then later, under enchantment, as an old woman. I thought the pretty, non-threatening appearance of young wizard Howl contrased nicely with Christian Bales’ deep voice, and was a very believable object of attraction for a young girl. I also very much liked the appearance of Calcifer the fire demon, and thought that Billy Crystal did an admirably funny, restrained job of voicing him. And the moving castle was a wonder to behold. As usual for Miyazaki’s films, the young girl has to find solutions and help both herself and those around her, not just without adults but often in spite of them. Miyazaki’s film, like the Diana Wynne Jones book it is based on, does not gloss over the fact of evil in the world, or the sometime stupidity of adults. The book and the movie honor their young audience members by portraying a complex story with complex heroes. The movie perhaps works best as a companion to the book, which is one I have recommended before. Diana Wynne Jones is a British author of children’s fantasy books, and the Harry Potter series owes much to her work.

Bowling for Columbine

Monday, July 25th, 2005

#33 is my movie challenge for the year is Michael Moore’s acclaimed documentary. Yes, Moore can be annoying and manipulative. He tossed around some very fuzzy numbers. But he is also quite funny, and I appreciate how his tenacity often got results, as when he and two boys who had been shot at Columbine High School visited KMart headquarters, and got them to stop selling bullets nationwide. His point, which I don’t think he made clear enough, is that while people should have the right to have guns, they don’t really need them for protection. He blamed the American media and government for creating an environment of fear that resulted in a more gun-toting, violent society.

Ironically, I was still thinking over his point about how our fears about safety far outstrip the actual likelihood of violence in our lives when some drunk yahoo smashed our front porch window over the weekend. I was glad for our home security system.

The Bourne Supremacy

Friday, July 22nd, 2005

#32 in my movie challenge for the year. The Bourne Supremacy was a solid spy movie, with good perfomances all around and well-filmed action and car-chase sequences. Matt Damon is suprisingly effective, as he was in The Bourne Identity, as an action hero. The shaky camera got a little annoying at times; I hope that the current penchant for this will wane soon.